When a child is struggling emotionally, they rarely say, “I feel anxious because of an unresolved internal conflict.” They act it out. They play it out. Psychodynamic therapy for children is built on exactly this insight – that a child’s inner world, with all its fears, conflicts, and unconscious tensions, is most honestly expressed not through words, but through play. This approach, rooted in over a century of psychoanalytic thought, remains one of the most nuanced and developmentally sensitive frameworks available for treating psychological disturbances in young children.
Table of Contents
- Origins: from little hans to the consulting room
- Anna Freud and Melanie Klein: two visions of child therapy
- Anna Freud’s approach
- Melanie Klein’s approach
- Core techniques used in psychodynamic therapy with children
- Free play
- Projective and symbolic play
- The therapeutic relationship and interpretation
- Working with parents
- What conditions does psychodynamic therapy address in children?
- Evidence base: does psychodynamic therapy for children work?
- Key benefits of psychodynamic therapy for children
- Who is best suited for psychodynamic therapy?
Origins: from little hans to the consulting room
Psychodynamic psychotherapy with children began in 1909 when Sigmund Freud supervised the treatment of a five-year-old boy, famously known as “Little Hans,” who had developed an intense phobia of horses. Freud did not work with Hans directly – instead, he guided the boy’s father through the process, analyzing Hans’s words, fears, and play as windows into his unconscious anxieties. This case established a foundational principle: a child’s symptoms are rarely surface-level. They are communications about deeper, hidden conflicts.
Freud believed the Little Hans case illustrated how children could struggle with unconscious sexual conflicts and anxieties, producing symptoms similar to those found in adult neuroses – even within loving, ordinary families. Though Freud himself was skeptical about taking very young children into formal analysis, his work set the stage for those who came after him.
Following Freud, Hermine von Hug-Hellmuth became the first clinician to formally treat children using talk and play, publishing her early observations in 1920. The field then advanced substantially through the pioneering work of two towering figures: Anna Freud and Melanie Klein.
Anna Freud and Melanie Klein: two visions of child therapy
Both Anna Freud and Melanie Klein developed their approaches to child analysis around the same time, yet arrived at significantly different conclusions about how it should be done. Understanding their divergence helps clarify what psychodynamic therapy with children actually involves in practice.
Anna Freud’s approach
Anna Freud viewed the child’s relationship with the therapist as the central engine of therapeutic change. She saw the analyst as more of an educator, using psychoanalytic theory to build a positive therapeutic alliance with the child before any deeper interpretive work could begin. She believed strongly in starting from the child’s conscious reality and working slowly toward unconscious material. Unlike Klein, Anna Freud did not consider all play to be symbolic – she acknowledged that children sometimes replay real events or simply engage in pure exploration. A child rummaging through a therapist’s bag, for Anna Freud, was not necessarily searching for symbolic meaning; they might simply be curious.
Anna Freud also advocated for greater child participation in the play process, making the therapeutic experience a positive one so the child would want to return to therapy. She prioritized ego functions, defense mechanisms, and developmental stages, paying close attention to how children manage anxiety and internal conflict as they grow.
Melanie Klein’s approach
Melanie Klein took a bolder, more interpretive stance. She developed a technique of play therapy building on Freud’s method of free association, arguing that since children cannot express themselves easily through words, they could do so through play and art. For Klein, a child’s play was the direct equivalent of an adult’s free associations – a royal road into the unconscious. She arranged a simple set of small toys on a low table and observed how children engaged with them from the very first session, interpreting their play actively and directly.
Klein used play therapy to uncover unconscious conflicts underlying children’s dysfunctional behavior, focusing especially on early experiences of abandonment, envy, and aggression. She believed that even very young children could benefit from having their unconscious conflicts named and interpreted. This was a sharp departure from Anna Freud, who felt that deep interpretations should come only after the therapeutic relationship was securely established.
The Kleinian method derives primarily from the direct application of psychoanalytic technique, while Anna Freud’s method is more firmly grounded in developmental theory. Both approaches shaped modern psychodynamic child therapy, and most contemporary practice draws on elements of both.
Core techniques used in psychodynamic therapy with children
Psychodynamic psychotherapy focuses on understanding the issues that motivate and influence a child’s behavior, thoughts, and feelings, and it uses several distinctive techniques to do this. These are not simply recreational activities. Each technique is a structured way of accessing what the child cannot yet say in words.
Free play
In free play sessions, the therapist provides a range of toys, art materials, and objects and allows the child to choose what they want to engage with – without a structured agenda. The therapist observes carefully, noting recurring themes, unusual behavior, and emotional reactions. A child who repeatedly creates scenes of conflict or disaster with figurines may be processing real-world anxiety. One who enacts scenes of loss or abandonment with dolls may be working through feelings about a parental separation. The key is that the therapist observes how the child uses play materials, identifying themes and patterns to understand the child’s problems.
Projective and symbolic play
Psychodynamic therapy also uses projective techniques – for example, asking a child to tell a story using toys or dolls. Through this, a child can project their own emotional experiences onto fictional characters, exploring painful feelings indirectly and safely. Since play is a natural form of expression in children, it serves to express feelings and thoughts that reflect the child’s internal world, including fantasy and conflict-laden emotions. Just the act of expressing those feelings through play is considered cathartic and therapeutically valuable in itself.
Symbolism runs through this process. When a child makes a small figure fall repeatedly from a toy building, or places an animal in a cage over and over, the therapist is trained to recognize these actions not just as play, but as symbolic language. Repetition of a traumatic situation during play helps make it more manageable, and children gradually attain mastery over those situations over time.
The therapeutic relationship and interpretation
A dynamically-oriented therapist recognizes that a child’s emotional distress is often an expression of internal psychic conflict. The therapist creates a nonjudgmental space, carefully labeling emotions as they emerge during play – not by telling the child what they feel, but by gently naming what seems to be happening in the play. Over time, this enables the child to recognize and articulate their own emotional states. Children often worry about the power of their own strong feelings, and it can be deeply reassuring to interact with someone who is not overwhelmed by intense emotional expression.
The therapist’s choice between more expressive interventions (those that bring unconscious feelings closer to the surface) and supportive interventions (those that strengthen coping) depends on the child’s ego strength. Children with stronger ego strength – greater capacity for impulse control, reality testing, and frustration tolerance – benefit more from expressive therapy, while those with lower ego strength benefit from more supportive, developmentally-assistive approaches.
Working with parents
Psychodynamic child therapy does not treat the child in isolation. Parents are considered essential partners. Contributions from theorists such as Bowlby, Winnicott, Erikson, and Stern have enriched the field by emphasizing attachment theory and the critical importance of working with parents alongside the child. Parent sessions – often conducted by a separate therapist – help caregivers understand the child’s emotional world and adjust their own responses accordingly. Research has found that parent work is often especially helpful when the child’s level of risk is significant, providing a supportive layer that reinforces therapeutic gains at home.
What conditions does psychodynamic therapy address in children?
Psychodynamic therapy is particularly well-suited to children dealing with emotional or internalizing difficulties – anxiety, depression, phobias, social withdrawal, and the effects of trauma or family disruption. Research shows that children with emotional disorders respond well to psychodynamic therapy, and it is often shown to be more effective for internalizing than externalizing disorders.
Children with emotional or internalizing disorders respond better than those with primarily disruptive or externalizing disorders, though there is growing evidence that psychodynamic approaches can address a wider range of difficulties when adapted appropriately. Studies also suggest that children who have experienced trauma – including those living in foster care or in households marked by parental conflict – can show significant benefits from psychodynamic therapy, with group formats showing particular promise for trauma-related presentations.
Evidence base: does psychodynamic therapy for children work?
For many years, psychodynamic therapy was criticized for lacking rigorous empirical support. That picture has changed. A systematic review identifying 34 separate studies – including nine randomized controlled trials – found increasing evidence for the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and adolescents. Importantly, brief psychodynamic therapy has shown positive outcomes for both internalizing and externalizing difficulties, accounting for age-related differences and diagnostic categories.
One particularly encouraging finding concerns the sleeper effect: psychodynamic therapy has been found useful for internalizing symptoms in both the short and long term, with some treatment effects only fully emerging after therapy ends. This suggests that the internal changes set in motion during therapy continue to develop even once sessions are over – a sign that the work goes deeper than symptom management alone. Psychodynamic therapy is known for its long-lasting effects, as the insight gained during sessions can continue to shape a person’s thinking and behavior well into the future.
Key benefits of psychodynamic therapy for children
Beyond symptom reduction, psychodynamic therapy offers several meaningful benefits that set it apart from more directive, technique-focused approaches:
Emotional articulation: Children learn to name and process emotions they previously could only act out. Over time, the implicit – things felt but not spoken – becomes explicit and manageable.
Insight into patterns: Psychodynamic therapy can help identify a child’s typical behavior patterns, defenses, and responses to inner conflicts, giving both the child and their parents a clearer picture of what is driving distressing behavior.
Treating the root, not just the symptom: Psychodynamic therapists do not focus only on the presenting symptom, because the symptom is understood as a manifestation of a more complex internal issue. Addressing only the surface behavior risks it being replaced by a new one – unless the underlying conflict is resolved.
Stronger ego development: Through the therapeutic process, children develop greater capacity to manage difficult emotions, tolerate frustration, and engage more effectively with the people around them.
Lasting change: Psychodynamic therapy encourages the processing of emotions that may have been ignored or suppressed, leading to relief and improved emotional health that tends to persist beyond the therapy itself.
Who is best suited for psychodynamic therapy?
Not every child is an equal candidate for psychodynamic therapy. A psychodynamic diagnostic evaluation is essential to assess a child’s suitability for this form of psychotherapy. Children who tend to respond best are those with sufficient psychological curiosity, some capacity for self-reflection, and the ability to tolerate emotional discomfort in a safe setting. Age matters too – younger children are likely to show a larger treatment response, possibly because they are more naturally immersed in symbolic, imaginative play.
The therapist’s own qualifications matter significantly as well. A clinician working with children psychodynamically should be knowledgeable about child development, well-acquainted with the range of psychodynamic theories – including ego psychology, object relations, and attachment theory – and trained under supervision across different developmental stages and presentations.
Psychodynamic therapy for children is not a quick fix, and it was never designed to be one. It is a sustained, careful process of helping a young person make sense of their inner life – one session, one drawing, one small toy figure at a time. What it offers is something that symptom-targeted approaches alone often cannot: an understanding of the whole child, and a path toward emotional freedom that lasts.
What do you think? If a child’s play is a window into their unconscious mind, how might parents and caregivers become more attuned to the emotional themes in their child’s everyday play at home? And given the long-lasting effects of psychodynamic therapy, do you think it deserves greater recognition alongside cognitive and behavioral approaches in standard child mental health care?
References
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686640/
- https://melanie-klein-trust.org.uk/child-analysis/the-beginnings-of-child-analysis/
- https://www.psychceu.com/schaefer/0471264725.pdf
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8642183/
- https://mnwc.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Play-Therapy.pdf
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09731342241238524
- https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Melanie_Klein
- https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/FFF-Guide/Psychotherapies-For-Children-And-Adolescents-086.aspx
- https://www.mghclaycenter.org/parenting-concerns/grade-school/psychodynamic-child-psychotherapy/
- https://www.jaacap.org/article/S0890-8567(12)00141-4/fulltext
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6951412/
- https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662671/full
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216029358_Psychodynamic_Psychotherapy_for_Children_and_Adolescents_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Evidence_Base'
- https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/psychodynamic-therapy
Leave a Reply